About Me

My photo
22. Wanderlust Enthusiast. General Rambler.
Showing posts with label Campaign. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Campaign. Show all posts

Wednesday, 7 November 2012

Pro-Life? Gravestones Are More Pro-Life Than You

Abortion

There we go, I've said it and if you're wondering why it's there in big red letters, all singing and all dancing, it's so that we can just get over the word and move on.

Manchester is a pretty liberal place, given that it's home to more that 80,000+ students and one of the biggest gay communities in the country, that is hardly a surprise. So you can imagine my disgust when, as I walked towards the bus stop this morning I saw a small sandwich board with the words 'Warning: Graphic Abortion Images Ahead'. Instantly, my Obama led good mood burst into a million tiny pieces. I was furious, especially when, as I grew closer to the cluster of fairly bloody images I noticed that, low and behold, the majority of the protesters were men. Enraged, and with 10 minutes until my class and 20 minute bus journey ahead, I got on the bus and tweeted until my fingers bled (alright, that may be an exaggeration). What the hell do men have to protest on what women do with their bodies? Why is it that they were the ones holding up the posters and handing out the leaflets? And why was it that yet again, women were allowing men to tell us how we can and cannot be seen and what we can and cannot do?

Then I realized something; yeah the blokes were protesting against a woman's right to an abortion, but more importantly there were two women there, protesting their own right to an abortion. It's like cutting off your nose in spite of your face. Not every women will require an abortion, not every women will chose to have one, even if she does fall unexpectedly pregnant, but the important part is that the choice is there and that it is ours. 

Last night saw President Obama be voted back into the White House for another 4 years and here in the UK it appeared to most that he was the only candidate worth considering. Romney had, on more than one occasion, come across as ignorant, racist, sexist homophobe, leading many of us to question how anyone that wasn't a straight, white man could bring themselves to vote for him. Yet, it was one of the closest elections in US history and even now, not all the states have been counted for, despite the President having been re-elected. The speech Romney and his senators gave about women's healthcare, their plans to cut planned parenthood and their want to make abortions illegal again sent shivers down the spine of near every woman I know. 

Could it be that the UK is going the same way? Not so long ago, I read that there is movement growing within Parliament to review abortion and women's rights and we've seen a massive increase in Pro-Life/Anti-Abortion protests taking place outside various Abortion Clinics in the UK in the same way they do in the US. These people line up outside and heckle the women going in and out of the clinic, as if the choice to terminate a pregnancy isn't arguably the most difficult choice a women will ever have to face. These people make the whole ordeal far more horrific than it need be. Just two weeks ago the opening of the new abortion clinic in Belfast was met on the head of thousands of protesters carrying graphic posters and sayings.

Here in the UK, the cut off point for an abortion is 24 weeks, which, in my opinion may be too far into the pregnancy as, premature babies born at around this stage have been known to survive. Even still, it is no excuse for people to dictate whether or not we are allowed the choice to one. It angers me that these people feel they have the moral high ground to tell us what a women should and shouldn't be allowed to do with her body on such a grand and important scale...

Yes, I am fully aware that as a part of the No More Page 3 Campaign, it could be said that I too am telling women what they can and cannot do. I am not. The Campaign is to get boobs taken out of a newspaper (are naked boobs news? No.) The campaign is not trying to stop the girls who model on Page 3 from being in the Glamour industry, we are not stopping them from taking off their clothes for money, we aren't against porn, or strip clubs or pretty young women (hello, most of them are my age ffs, why would I try and STOP them being successful?!). Our campaign is about making sure the beauty and nakedness of the girls reaches those who are looking for it, those who understand it and know what it is. Not those who don't understand or don't want to see boobs with their cereal and kids around the breakfast table first thing in the morning. So if I could please be spared the chorus 'YOU HYPOCRITICAL SLAG', I would be most grateful.

Maybe if these extremist protest groups spent more time fighting for better sex education within UK Secondary Schools, so that young people grow up being better informed about sex, contraception, the way contraception works and the different options available  there wouldn't be the need for such horrendous protests in the first place.

Because, in a nation that has the highest teen pregnancy and STI rate in Europe, our sex ed is a joke, and when you think that 13 years olds are becoming increasingly more sexually active it is irresponsible to keep sweeping the issue under the carpet. Perhaps when MPs vow to put more effort into educating Key Stage 3 and GCSE students, rather than just making sure they 'pass their exams', I'll be as excited about UK politics as I am about US politics.

So put your graphic banners away, get your heads out of your own hot air, wake up and smell the coffee. Sex is not the problem, it's the attitude towards it that holds us back. 

Sunday, 16 September 2012

Boobs at Dawn

Being part of a campaign like No More Page 3 was always going to come with it's hurdles because nothing worth having comes easy. Especially being the age I am and living the lifestyle I lead (unfortch, it's a quite drunk student lifestyle and not a particularly glamorous one), I feel I have to fight even harder to be heard and understood than the adults involved with campaign. Maybe it's because people within my age group are the most sexually active, the biggest watchers of porn and the largest readers of lads mags but whatever the case, I feel the need to set the story straight from the word go so that no one can turn around and call me something I'm not.

I am not pretentious or uptight. I am not insecure (Well alright, I am a little bit buy hey, we all have our hang-ups), I am not some nerdy virgin, a strangely religious being or bra burning feminist.
I am a student, a drinker, a fashion magazine obsessed, X Factor loving, boy crazy 19 year old girl. I don't like spiders, can't lift anything that's very heavy and yes, sometimes I am still scared of the dark.

None of that should matter though. I support the No More Page 3 campaign for a few very simple reasons, and not one of them is because I am a self-loathing prude.

I support this campaign because:

  • I am bored of being unable to wear a low cut top without the conversation being directed at my chest all night.
  • I genuinely do believe it conditions us all to think it's ok to see another human being as a half naked commodity.
  • I am a DD and actually, finding underwear in my size is a nightmare. Don't put out the idea that with boobs 'bigger is better' when actually, bigger tends to mean more expensive and harder to find.
  • When I have a picture of a topless male as my screensave it makes me look 'sad', 'pathetic' and 'obsessed' but when a guy can oogle over the Page 3 everyday that's alright.
  • I am worth more than my chest.
  • When David Beckham was poised in his Armani' it was like 'Here you go ladies, have a treat', like it was something special that we don't get very often but blokes get a beautiful half naked lady everyday and it's seen as normal.
  • But mostly, because in 15-20 years time, when I have a daughter or a son, I want them to have a grown up in a world where you aren't conditioned to viewing anyone in a certain light. Where there are no pre-judgements of a person because of some way they are 'supposed' to be seen.
I just think that now, enough is enough. Page 3 is uncalled for, no one's lively hood depends on it, Google will kill it off sooner or later but I want us to get there first.


Thursday, 30 August 2012

Oh...Tits!

Ah, the daily papers. Filled with news from around the globe, celebrity gossip, the weather forecasts, important political views and boobs.

Wait, what?!

Ah yes, if you are British, female and a regular reader of the paper then you probably already know what I'm talking about. In fact, you don't even have to be a female, you could be male, cat, dog or mouse and you've probably already picked up on what I'm chatting about. That's right, Page 3.

Now, before I go any further I am just going to state right here and right now that I LIKE BOOBS. No, this isn't me coming out of the closest, I'm just saying that glamour modelling itself isn't something I disagree with. Nor am I against sex, people that have sex, people that watch porn. people that buy lads mags, sexy underwear or newspapers. For crying out loud, I'm 19 years old! Of course I like sex and underwear and my first year flat was famous for our kitchen wall quite loving decorated with Nuts magazine cut outs. I just don't feel it necessary to have boobs in a newspaper. 

Boobs aren't news, they're just not.  They didn't just appear on planet earth, they've been around for awhile now and well, they're just not news!

That is why I was over the moon when a fantastic writer and friend of mine, invited me to be part of the No More Page 3 Campaign, started when during the Olympics she noticed that even though Jessica Ennis had just secured the hopes of the nation in winning gold in her Heptathlon event, the largest image of any female in The Sun was still the day's Page 3 girl. 

I mean, it's almost laughable, a women who has put her heart and soul into 4 years of training for ONE event, who was made the face of the London 2012 games which have, arguably, been the most successful games to date, still isn't worth as much page space as a girl who has her boobs out. Brilliant. The Suffragettes are probably turning in their graves, spitting feathers and thinking to themselves 'Well, what was the bloody point?!'

And it's true, what was the point? I'm not going to start burning my bra or join some strong Feminist rebellion, but let's be honest here, isn't it just a little bit rubbish that women are still being portrayed as items of sexual desire in a FAMILY newspaper? At least Nuts and Zoo and Maxim and Playboy dedicate entire magazines to us. At least with them it really is an industry, a career. Page 3 just seems out dated, sexist and more than anything, silly. We don't need boobs in The Sun. Honestly, we really don't. I can almost promise it won't affect the paper's sales and that it won't affect the way people take in the news. 

Getting rid of Page 3 will help promote women in a far healthier light and at the end of the day it's not like we get the torso of Dave, 21, from South Shields on Page 5 do we? IT'S A SHEER LACK EQUALITY HERE PEOPLE!

So, let's be equal and let's change the papers of tomorrow. Please sign the petition and spread the word because actually, I really believe in this campaign and it's ability to change the tabloids for the better.


- Hayley xx